(*Reprinted from Food Poisoning for Thought as part my ongoing process to unify my web presence.*)
So Jonathan Haidt noted that the hallmark of a
liberal is openness to experience. Well openness to experience is an
easy trick when one's own dinner and home and comfort are not
threatened. And although the oft cited rule about there being
no atheists in foxholes has been nearly continuously proven wrong by
history, the aphorism does point out rightly that maintaining beliefs is
more difficult when our comfort is threatened.
When we find ourselves in situations where our
morals and beliefs will expose us to trials and discomfort, we discovery
quickly how strongly we believed. The Spanish Inquisition discovered
the torture was an easy way to make devil worshiper
that are Christians, and many a caliphate discovered the taxation was
an easy way to make the infidel into a Muslim. A belief untested by the
fire may not be a belief that all. The fire will either forge us or fry
us alive.
And all of this brings to the educated liberal
elite. Holding an ideology of non violent tolerance and openness and
sharing of the wealth is easy when one's own wealth is not being shared,
when one's own hone is not being opened, when the
violence being tolerated is not being inflicted on those close to you.
To Quote the character of Higgins in the Robert
Redford classic movie 'Three Days of the Condor'; "Ask 'em when they're
running out. Ask 'em when there's no heat in their homes and they're
cold. Ask 'em when their engines stop. Ask 'em
when people who have never known hunger start going hungry. You wanna
know something? They won't want us to ask 'em. They'll just want us to
get it for 'em!"
Am I saying that all liberals are conservatives
with a coat of privilege on them? No, but a lot of them are. What I am
saying is that liberal and conservative are convenient labels that we
generally only have the luxury of applying to ourselves
when times are good, even if they aren't as good as we think they
should be.
No comments:
Post a Comment